# Independent Review Result

Version: 0.1  
Status: Completed isolated AI packet-only review  
Date: 2026-06-13  
Project: RTW-02 / Human & AI – LAB  

## Purpose

This document records the independent-context review of the unchanged rubric v0.1 packet and compares it with both calibration passes.

The reviewer was an isolated AI agent started without conversation history and instructed to read only:

- `mapping_second_review_packet_v0_1.json`
- `mapping_second_review_template_v0_1.json`

It was prohibited from reading prior scores, rubric v0.2, audit documents, comparison files, changelog, or git history.

This is independent from the calibration context, but it is not an external human review.

## Files

- Independent response: `data/rtw-02/mapping_independent_review_completed_v0_1.json`
- Three-review comparison: `data/rtw-02/mapping_three_review_comparison_v0_1.json`
- Independent review manifest: `data/rtw-02/independent_review_manifest_v0_1.json`
- Comparison script: `scripts/compare_three_mapping_reviews.py`

## Validation

- Review cases completed: `17/17`
- Independent metadata required: `PASS`
- Packet contamination findings: `0`
- Original calibration manifest: `PASS`
- Independent response SHA-256: `4930ef58f8c48a97575bc035eb2f65baeb0845cc42c5cd53102753509ebb35c1`

## Main Result

All three reviews ranked the same pair first:

- `OT7_Divided_Kingdom`
- `BTC6_SegWit_Scaling_Era`

Scores:

| Review | Score |
|---|---:|
| Calibration pass 1 | 7.50 |
| Calibration pass 2 | 7.50 |
| Isolated independent AI | 8.33 |

The independent review also classified this pair as the only:

- `strong_structural_hypothesis`

Its next-highest pair scored `4.17`, producing a `4.16` point lead in the independent review.

This strengthens the relative ranking result. It still does not prove hidden intent or historical causation.

## Review Distribution

| Classification | Calibration 1 | Calibration 2 | Independent |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| Strong structural hypothesis | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Medium structural hypothesis | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| Weak analogy | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Rejected mapping | 7 | 7 | 8 |

The independent reviewer was substantially stricter with non-target analogies.

## Agreement

### Calibration 1 vs Independent

- exact score agreement: `6/17` (`35.29%`)
- classification agreement: `10/17` (`58.82%`)
- mean absolute score difference: `1.2759`

### Calibration 2 vs Independent

- exact score agreement: `7/17` (`41.18%`)
- classification agreement: `10/17` (`58.82%`)
- mean absolute score difference: `1.0300`

The second calibration pass was modestly closer to the independent review.

## Criterion Agreement

| Criterion | Calibration 1 vs Independent | Calibration 2 vs Independent |
|---|---:|---:|
| Generic type overlap | 76.47% | 76.47% |
| Role/function match | 41.18% | 47.06% |
| Event sequence match | 76.47% | 88.24% |
| Conflict/transition mechanism | 52.94% | 52.94% |
| Outcome/aftermath match | 76.47% | 82.35% |
| Source evidence specificity | 94.12% | 94.12% |

The largest remaining reviewer discretion is in:

- role/function match
- conflict/transition mechanism

Rubric v0.2 already clarifies event sequence and outcome/aftermath, but it was not used to alter this v0.1 review.

## Rubric v0.2 Boundary

Rubric v0.2 is preserved only for a separate future rescore.

Created but not completed:

- `data/rtw-02/mapping_rescore_packet_v0_2.json`
- `data/rtw-02/mapping_rescore_template_v0_2.json`

No v0.1 result was overwritten or silently rescored.

## Tény / Számítás / Hipotézis / Kontroll / Következő Lépés

### Tény

- The isolated reviewer completed all 17 cases from the unchanged v0.1 packet.
- All three passes selected OT7/BTC6 as the top pair.
- The independent reviewer assigned `8.33/10`.
- Non-target mappings were generally scored lower by the independent reviewer.

### Számítás

- Independent target lead: `4.16`
- Calibration 1 vs independent mean absolute difference: `1.2759`
- Calibration 2 vs independent mean absolute difference: `1.0300`

### Hipotézis

- OT7/BTC6 may have a more robust event and mechanism structure than the generic-overlap controls.
- Reviewer discretion still materially affects medium and weak mappings.

### Kontroll

- Packet and template checksums match the frozen calibration record.
- The isolated reviewer had no inherited conversation context.
- Independent metadata and all 17 reviews passed validation.
- The independent response and comparison are checksum-manifested.

### Következő Lépés

- Preserve this result as the rubric v0.1 independent AI review.
- Consider a separate human independent review for stronger external validity.
- Run rubric v0.2 only as a new versioned rescore, never as an overwrite.
- Before v0.2 scoring, consider clarifying role/function and mechanism criteria as well.